一段时间以来,语文学科建设中的“人文性”与“工具性”之争,依旧左右着课堂教学的走向。人文论占据上风时,网络与纸媒中铺天盖地的都是人文性课堂的经典案例;而工具论占上风后,这些曾经占尽风光的精彩课案,又立刻遭到许多人的诟病。这种随“风”倒的课程评价本身,同样体现了语文学科建设缺乏体系化、科学化和规范化的先天不足。 For some time, the “humanism” and “instrumentality” in the construction of Chinese subjects still dictates the direction of classroom teaching. When the humanities theory took the upper hand, both the Internet and the paper media were a classic case of the humanities classroom. After the tool theory gained the upper hand, these wonderful lessons that once occupied the scenery were immediately criticized by many people. This course evaluation with the “wind” reflects the inherent deficiencies of the lack of systematic, scientific, and standardized Chinese language discipline construction.