Means of Livelihood and Living Space of Registered Burmese Nationals Living in the Towns in the Sino

来源 :民族学刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:yjm17207928
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  (Science and Technology Division, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, 650500 ,China)
  JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY, VOL. 8, NO.1, 75-83, 2017 (CN51-1731/C, in Chinese)
  DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9391.2017.01.09Abstract:Against the background of good border trade policies and the prosperous economy of China, and in addition to the ethnic groups who have lived along the border for generations, a large number of Burmese nationals have entered the Sino-Burmese border area, seeking opportunities to work, trade and live. Among the population of foreigners living in China, Burmese nationals take fourth place. They are mainly distributed in the Sino-Burmese border areas. Based on an in-depth investigation of the Burmese nationals who have crossed the border and live in the Ruili National Development Experimental Zone, the paper points out the structural differences between those Burmese nationals who belong to Cross-border Ethnic Groups and those who are cross-border migrants and who concentrate in and ethnic enclaves. It also specifies their different means of livelihood, living spaces and religious practices.
  The survey shows that the Burmese nationals who belong to Cross-border Ethnic Groups can be traced back to the official border demarcation of the two countries in 1960, when they migrated to towns and farms in Ruili, mainly through marriage, and made their living by engaging in traditional agriculture, selling petty commodities, trading agricultural products, opening traditional restaurant/guest houses, offering tourism services or starting family handicraft workshops. They mainly speak their ethnic minority language, and are able to understand some Chinese. They are bound together by the same religious beliefs inside and outside of China. According to the investigation, since the marriage registration for Sino-Burmese Border Area in 2006, at the end of 2014, there are 2331 registered transnational couples in Ruili City, all of whom are Burmese nationals who live along the border. Except for some Han People who married other ethnic peoples, the rest of the ethnic groups were endogamous. According to my field survey, which was confirmed by local woman cardees, the number of cross-border marriages in Ruili is actually much higher than this statistic. This is because, for a variety of reasons, a substantial number of couples did not go to the registration office.
  As for the Burmese who are cross-border migrants and who concentrate in ethnic enclaves, they are mostly Burman, Sino-Burmese, Burmese Indians and Burmese Pakistanis, and Arakanese. Since Chinas 1992 policy to open the border, the Jiegao Bridge connecting China and Burma was built, and this group of people began to enter China. In recent years, with the industrial transformation and development in the Ruili area, as well as the better social environment, more and more Burmese nationals have crossed the border and settled down in Ruili, making a living by buying(or renting) houses, selling raw materials for jewelry and jade, processing Rosewood, and working as factory workers, construction workers, waiters and waitresses, and peddlers, etc. They mainly speak Burmese (Sino-Burmese are bilingual). Influenced and dominated by government policies, their choices of living areas are related to their ethnic identity, religious beliefs and economic power. The city of Ruili has undoubtedly left its mark.   In summary,although the “human migration” of a “Transnational class” under the background of globalization, including -immigrants, migrant laborers, and migrant businessmen, “Transnational social space” has been constructed in various megalopolis like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, a more complicated means of livelihood and living space has been constructed by those Burmese nationals “who belong to Cross-border Ethnic Groups”, and those Burmese nationals who cross the border as migrants and live in ethnic enclaves in the border cities and towns of Yunnan and Burma.
  Key Words:Sino-Burmese Border, Ruili, Burmese nationals, means of livelihood, living space.
  References:
  Fang Tie.yunnan kuajing minzu de fenbu,liayuan jiqi tedian (Distribution,Origin and Characteristics of Cross-border Ethnic Groups in Yunnan Province). In Journal of GuangXi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2007(5):9-20.
  He Ming.kaifang, hexie yu zuquan kuaguo hudong—yi zhongguo xinan yu dongnanya guojia bianmin kuaguo liudong wei zhongxin de taolun (Openness,Harmony and Transnational Ethnic Interaction-A Discussion around the Transnational Population Flows between Southwest China and Southeast Asia). In Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2012(1):2-7.
  He Shaoying. yunnan kuajing minzu wenhua chutan (Research on Cross- border National Culture in Yunnan. Beijing: zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 2011.
  Li Tao. dehong daizu jingpozu zizhizhou mianji “sanfei” renyuan de guanli wenti yanjiu (Research on the Administration of Illegal Immigrants of Burmese in Dehong.Yunnan. M.A.thesis, Yunnan University.2013.
  LiYujie. dehong bianjing diqu “sanfei” waiguoren xiangzhuang de sikao yu duice (Thoughts and Countermeasures towards Illegal Foreign Immigrants in Dehong Border Areas).In Journal of Yunnan Police Officer Academy,2012(5):116-119.
  LiangYucheng. zai guangzhou de feizhouyi yimin xingwei de yinguo jizhi—leiji yinguo shiye xia de yimin xingwei yanjiu(African Immigration in Guangzhou, China:A Cumulative Causation Perspective on Immigrating Behavior). In Socological Studies,2013(1):134-244.
  Liu Yungang, Tan Yuwen. Zhou Wenting. guanzhou riben yimin de shenghuo huodong yu shenghuo kongjian (Japanese Expatriates in Guangzhou City:The Activity and Living Space).In ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2010(65):1173-1186.
  LiuYungang, Chen Yue.guangzhou riben yimin zuyi jingji de xingcheng jiqi shehui kongjian tezheng (Global Economy,Local Landscape:Study on the Ethnic Economy of Japanese Expatriates in Guangzhou City).In ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA.2014(10):1533-1546.   Li Zhigang, Xue Desheng, Lyons Metal.guangzhou xiaobeilu heiren jujuqu shehui kongjian fenxi (The African Enclave of Guangzhou: A Case Study of Xiaobeilu). In ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA,2008(2):207-218.
  Ma Xiaoyan.yimin shequ de duoyuan wenhua chongtu yu hexie—beijingshi wangjing “hanguocheng” yanjiu(The Conflicts and Harmony of Multi-culture in Immigrant Community-the Study of Wangjing “Korean Town” of Beijing).In China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition,2008(4):118-126.
  Yao Huasong, Xu Xueqiang. xifang renkiu qianyi yanjiu jinzhan (Progress of Research on Migration in Western Countries). In World Regional Studies.2008(1):154-166.
  Zhang Jinpeng, Bao Yueping. yunnan bianjiang minzu diqu kuajing hunyin yu shehui wending yanjiu (Research on Cross-border Marriage and Social Stability in the Minority Borderland of Yunnan). In Journal of Yunnan University of Nationalities(Social Sciences), 2013(1):47-54.
  Zhang Chengtie. dehong bianjing xian shi mianji laowu renyuan qunti tedian jiqi yixiang(Features and Effects of Myanmar workers in Dehong of Yunnan province).Manager Journal,2013(28):70-71.
  Zhang Jiazhong. ruili shi waiji liudong renkao de tedian(Characteristics of Foreign Floating Population in Ruili). In Journal of Hubei University of Police,2014(1):35-36.
  Zhang Jing. fazhi shiye xian mianji wugong renyuan de guanli he fuwu(Service and Administration of Burmese Laborer in the View of Legality). In Legal System and Society, 2013:209-210.
  Zhao Xiuyi. Jujiao zhongguo laodong zhibian—laodong guannian de shidai yueqian yu laodong xingtai de jiazha zhuanhuan (Focusing on Changes of “Labor” in China—Time Transition of Labor Concept and Value Transformation of Labor Relation). In Exploration and Free Views,2015(5):23-26.
  Zheng Xiaoyun. dangdai bianjiang diqu de minzu rentong yu guojia rentong —cong yunnan tanqi (Ethnic Identity and National Identity in Contemporary Frontier Areas-A Case Study of Yunnan Province). In Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities(Humanities and Social Sciences),2011(4):1-6.
  Zhou Ping. bianjiang zhili shiye zhong de rentong wenti (On the Identity Problems in the Perspective of Borderland Administration). In Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences).2009(1):11-17.
  Zhou Daming.wailaigong yu “eryuan shehui” (Migrant Labor and the“Dual Community”in the Pearl River Delta). In Jouraal of Sun Yat-sen University(Social Science Edition),2000(2):107-112.
其他文献
[摘要] 性别研究是当代人类学最具开创性与争议性的领域之一。性别建构反映了不同文化体系对两性分工与社会地位的规范,由此衍生的性别隐喻则体现了不同文化实践与建构的差别。摩梭人对女性性别的多元建构为我们研究女性性别建构提供了一个独特的、难得的个案。本文从空间分类、语言建构、亲属制度、宗教信仰、人观象征的多元视角与多重维度把女性性别建构放在整体文化脉络中了解与把握,将使女性性别建构拥有更大的研究空间。 
期刊
(1.Department of Anthropology,University College London,UK; 2.Southwest Nationalities  Research Academy,Southwest University for Nationalities,Chengdu,610041,Sichuan,China;3.University College London,
期刊
JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY,VOL.7,NO.1,3237,2015(CN511731/C,in Chinese)  DOI:10.3969/j.issn.16749391.2015.01.03 Abstract:The ethnic regions of Western China are rich in ecological and cultural tourism resour
期刊
[摘要]文章对李安宅写于1951年和1961年的两个版本自传进行比较阅读,揭示其内容差异与思想微妙变化之处,并藉此分析李安宅的早年生活对其后来人生的持续影响、李安宅的学术选择及政治纠结。走动在政学之间,贯穿了李安宅的大半生,也为其人生的跌宕提供了注脚。  [关键词]李安宅;传记;学术;政治  中图分类号:C912.4 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1674-9391(2016)01-0008-12  
期刊
[摘要] 路易·杜蒙的“古代印度的王权观念”一文是论述印度世俗化王权观念的重要文本。  杜蒙指出等级阶序是印度社会价值观念之核心,在阶序格局中祭司与国王的二分等级关系体现了地位与权力、宗教与王权、祭祀与巫术、价值与政治等社会范畴的“理想型”关系。所以要理解印度王权观念世俗化过程中生成的个体主义、契约理论和政治经济范畴,必须基于对“阶序”这一意识形态的社会学意义之理解上,以一种比较的视野来展开。  
期刊
[摘要]14世纪,西藏历史人物帕木竹巴万户长绛曲坚赞通过个人智慧与勇气,击败其它地方政治势力,开创了西藏帕木竹巴地方政权。他撰写的“朗氏家族史”是西藏历史文献中的重要部分,其中对于世系传承与历史事件有着丰富细致的文学描写与事实记录。本文通过对于朗氏家族史进行结构式的文本分析,重点介绍家族史中历史神话的创世权威,文献的事实构建与想象表述等。藏族历史文献是历史写作、文学创作与宗教观念传播的结合典范,它
期刊
(Southwest Nationalities Research Academy,Southwest University  for Nationalities,Chengdu,610041,Sichuan,China )  JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY, VOL.6,NO.5,39-47,2015(CN51-1731/C,in Chinese)  DOI:10.3969/j.iss
期刊
(School of Southeast Asian Studies,Yunnan University for Nationalities,Kunming,650031,Yunnan,China)  JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY,VOL.6,NO.5,64-70,2015(CN51-1731/C,in Chinese)  DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9391.20
期刊
(Minzu University of China,Beijing,China )  JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY, VOL.6,NO.5,48-53,2015(CN51-1731/C,in Chinese)  DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9391.2015.05.06  Abstract:   One of Alfred C.Haddons most notab
期刊
[摘要] 研究借用了心理学中对记忆的划分和欧洲学者维果茨基(L.S. Vygotsky)、巴赫金(M.M. Bakhtin)等人的中介概念,认为人是能使用工具(象征)的动物,所以记忆是一种经过中介调节的行动。将其同人类学的田野资料结合起来观察不同记忆共同体(mnemonic communities)对过去不同的解释。认为记忆共同体之间的差别关键在于“中介”,即集体中每个成员都用的文化工具——叙述工
期刊