论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨子宫三角切除术的临床应用价值。方法观察组25例采用子宫三角切除术,随机选择对照组25例子宫次全切除术,在手术时间、出血量、术后病率、手术3个月后生活质量满意度调查等方面对比两组术式的临床效果。结果研究组手术后临床效果,其手术时间短、出血少、术后病率低、手术3个月后生活质量满意度调查满意度高,与对照组相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论子宫三角切除术优于传统的子宫切除术。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of hysterectomy. Methods 25 cases of observation group were treated by hysterectomy and 25 cases of control group were randomly selected subtotal hysterectomy in the operation time, amount of bleeding, postoperative morbidity, satisfaction survey of quality of life after 3 months compared with the two groups The clinical effect of surgery. Results The clinical effect of the study group after operation was short, less bleeding, less postoperative morbidity, satisfactory satisfaction with quality of life survey after 3 months of operation, compared with the control group (P <0.05 ). Conclusions Uterotomy is superior to conventional hysterectomy.