论文部分内容阅读
交通肇事罪的司法认定极易出现不合理的情形,特别是在处理较为复杂的交通事故时,更易混淆罪与非罪的界限。原因在于司法实践没有明确本罪实行行为的地位,没有准确把握本罪实行行为的本质。因此,认定交通肇事罪的实行行为时,必须确立过失实行行为的独立地位,把握其违反结果回避义务的本质。只有违反交通运输管理法规,并且具备违反结果回避义务之实质内容的行为,才成立交通肇事罪的实行行为。
Judicial identification of traffic accident crime is extremely prone to unreasonable situations, especially when dealing with more complicated traffic accidents, it is more likely to confuse the boundaries between crime and non-crime. The reason is that judicial practice did not clarify the position of the crime and did not accurately grasp the nature of the crime. Therefore, when determining the crime of traffic accident, it is necessary to establish the independent status of the act of negligence and to grasp the essence of violating the obligation of avoiding the result. Only violations of traffic management laws and regulations, and have the obligation to evade the obligations of the substance of the contents of the act, only to establish the crime of traffic offenses.