一、引言最近,筆者有幸參加了北京市高級人民法院(以下簡稱“北京高院”)《專利侵權判定指南》(以下簡稱“指南”)執筆入介紹修訂進展的一個講座。在講座中,執筆人對涉及到間接侵權、功能性特徵解釋及標準必要專利(以下簡稱“SEP”)等多個問題作了詳細介紹,令人耳目一新。然而,在講座深度探討後,筆者對於有關SEP禁令救濟的部分依然持有一些保留意見。具體 I. INTRODUCTION Recently, the author was fortunate enough to attend a lecture presented by the Beijing Higher People’s Court (hereinafter referred to as the “Beijing High Court”) “Guide to Judgment of Patent Infringement” (hereinafter referred to as the “Guide”) for introducing the revision progress. In the lecture, the writer made a brief introduction to many issues concerning indirect infringement, interpretation of functional features and standard essential patents (hereinafter referred to as “SEP”). However, following a deep discussion of the lecture, I still have some reservations about the part of the SEP bail relief. specific