论文部分内容阅读
司法实践中的判断类型包括案情认知中的事实判断、证据确认中的事实判断和判决中的价值判断。在案情认知和证据认定中,司法人员所作的事实判断都是“理想类型”的建构过程,它们之间既有优劣之分,也会受到司法人员价值因素的影响;在审判阶段,判决属于价值判断,法官对法律条文、证据的理解等因素会影响判决的解释力和说服力。这三种判断类型在案件的侦破、起诉和审判阶段都可能会出现,但它们在不同阶段的类型化特征是一致的,借助于判断类型的分析,可以解释判决重要特征的同一性和差异性,使判决产生过程的真实性和丰富性得到呈现和揭示。
The types of judgments in judicial practice include fact judgment in case cognition, fact judgment in confirmation of evidence and value judgments in judgments. In the case cognition and evidence identification, judiciary’s factual judgment is the construction process of “ideal type ”, there are both advantages and disadvantages between them, and will also be affected by the value of judicial personnel; at the trial stage , Judgments belong to the value judgments, the judge’s understanding of the legal provisions, evidence and other factors will affect the interpretation of judgments and persuasion. These three types of judgments may appear in the detection, prosecution and trial stages of the case, but they are consistent in their typological characteristics at different stages. With the help of the analysis of the types of judgments, the identities and differences of the important features of the judgments can be explained , So that the authenticity and richness of the decision-making process are presented and revealed.