司法實務中,任何裁判結論的得出都是法官動態思維活動的結晶,而任何法官在思維過程中都會自覺或不自覺地運用一定的方法,此即所謂‘審判思維方法’。科學的審判思維方法有助於促進公正、高效司法,有助於法官素質的提升和法學研究的深入,更有助於保障民主政治和市場經濟的發展。具有代表性的審判思維方法主要有兩種——規範出發型審判思維方法和事實出發型審判思維方法。本文在總結和反思我國傳統審判思維方法的歷史成因和現實狀況的基礎上,對審判思維方法的歷史淵源和本質特徵進行梳理和比較,並設例分析從規範出發的民事審判思維方法在我 Judicial practice, the conclusion of any referees are the crystallization of the judge’s dynamic thinking activities, and any judge in the thinking process will consciously or unconsciously use certain methods, the so-called ’trial thinking method.’ The scientific method of trial and judgment helps to promote fair and efficient administration of justice, helps to improve the quality of judges and deepen legal studies, and helps to safeguard the development of democratic politics and market economy. There are two main representative methods of trial thinking: the normative starting trial trial and the de facto trial trial trial. On the basis of summarizing and reflecting on the historical and realistic conditions of the traditional trial thinking methods in our country, this paper sorts out and compares the historical origins and the essential features of the trial thinking methods, and provides an example analysis of the civil trial thinking method starting from the norms