论文部分内容阅读
对于著作权间接侵害行为,日本司法界主要依据民法中的共同侵权理论和判例中形成的“卡拉OK”法理来处理。这两种方法各有利弊,采用共同侵权理论很难追究侵权人的停止侵害并废弃相关物的责任,并且需要以直接侵权行为的存在为前提,而卡拉OK法理面临着法律根据,适用范围不明确以及“合法行为违法化”两大指责。在“ロクラクⅡ”和“まねきTV”两起案件的判决中,日本最高裁把卡拉OK法理定位于仅仅是法律解释的手法之一,并在判断著作物利用主体这一问题上,提出了诸因素“综合考虑”的判断手法,为处理著作权间接侵害问题提供了新的思路。
For indirect copyright infringement, the judiciary in Japan is mainly based on the theory of common infringement in civil law and the “karaoke” jurisprudence formed in jurisprudence. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. It is very difficult to investigate the infringer's responsibility to stop infringement and abandon the related matter by the theory of common infringement, and the existence of direct infringement needs to be presupposed, while the karaoke legal principle is confronted with the legal basis, and the scope of application is not Clear and “illegal act ” two accusations. In judgments in two cases, the supreme supreme court in Japan decided that the karaoke jurisprudence was only one way of interpreting the law and judged the subject of crop utilization , Put forward the judgments of various factors “considered synthetically ”, and provided a new idea for handling the indirect infringement of copyright.