论文部分内容阅读
无独立请求权第三人没有当事人的诉讼地位却要承担民事责任,违背了程序公正的原则,而其根本成因是忽视了被告型第三人的存在,应该将无独立请求权第三人区分为被告型第三人和辅助型第三人,被告型第三人因为存在承担民事责任的可能性,应该赋予完整的当事人地位,在被告型第三人制度的设计上,在坚持程序公正、意思自治和诉讼经济的原则下,可以参考美国的第三人引入制度及大陆法系的相关规定,构建一个公正合理的第三人制度。
The third party who has no independent right to claim does not have the litigation status of the party but has to bear civil liability and violates the principle of procedural fairness. However, the fundamental cause of the third party is the neglect of the defendant’s third party. The third party who has no independent claim should be distinguished For the defendant type third person and the auxiliary type third person, the defendant type third person because of the existence of the possibility of assuming civil liability, should be given a complete litigant status in the design of defendant-based third party system, adhere to procedural fairness, Meaning autonomy and litigation economy, we can refer to the introduction of the third party system in the United States and the relevant provisions of the civil law system to build a fair and reasonable third party system.