105年前,梁启超在《新民丛报》发表《新史学》一文,批评我们传统史学有四大弊端:一是只知有朝廷不知有国家,二十四史几乎成了二十四姓的家谱;二是只知有个人不知有群体,历代史书无非为帝王将相立传;三是只知有陈迹而不知有今务;四是只知有事实而不知有理想。他为此大声喊出“史界革命”的 105 years ago, Liang Qichao published a book entitled “New Historiography” in “Xinmin Cong Bao”, criticizing our traditional historiography for its four major drawbacks: First, only knowing that the court did not know any state, the history of the Twenty-Four Histories almost became the genealogy of the Twenty-Four surnames ; The second is only known to have a group of people I do not know, history books no more than the emperor will phase Zhichu; third is known to know there are traces of the present do not know; Fourth, only know the facts and I do not know the ideal. He shouted loudly out for this “revolution in history”