论文部分内容阅读
许多学者经常指出新公共管理成立基于所谓“新保守主义”、“新右派”或“新管理主义”的政治哲学,但很少有学者去了解上述三者的含义或予以区别。本文经整理新公共管理改革起源地——英国——的相关文献发现,以“新右派”作为改革的政治哲学较为适当。首先,新右派包括自由主义及新保守主义,而这两张政治哲学本质上充满许多对立之处,所以单用“新保守主义”称之并不恰当。其次,对“新右派”政治哲学及新公共管理议题系统的了解,有助于理解“改革策略”与“重建政府正当性、权威及公共性”之间的关联。
Many scholars often point out that NPM set up political philosophy based on the so-called “neoconservatism,” “neo-rightist” or “new management doctrine.” Few scholars have understood the meaning of the three the difference. In this paper, we find that it is more appropriate to adopt the “new right” as the political philosophy of reform by referring to the relevant literature that collated the origin of the reform of new public administrations - the United Kingdom. First of all, the new rightists include liberalism and neo-conservatism. These two political philosophy are intrinsically filled with many opposite points of view. Therefore, it is not appropriate to call “neo-conservatism” alone. Second, an understanding of the “new right” political philosophy and the system of new public administration issues helps to understand the link between “reform strategy ” and “rebuilding government legitimacy, authority and public ”.