论文部分内容阅读
目的对妇产科腹腔镜手术以及传统开腹手术的临床护理特点进行分析。方法 200例妇产科患者中,随机分为观察组和对照组,各100例。观察组采用腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗。结合手术特点给予针对性护理,分析两组患者护理情况。结果观察组术中出血量(87.91±12.09)ml、胃肠道功能恢复时间(1.98±0.27)d以及总住院时间(5.31±0.76)d均优于对照组的(148.31±15.21)ml、(3.21±1.05)d、(7.85±2.09)d,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分为(32.13±1.76)分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分为(38.13±1.45)分,低于对照组的(38.12±1.64)、(42.52±1.34)分,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论依据腹腔镜手术对患者造成创伤小、有助于恢复等特点,能使得临床护理功能更加有效进行,帮助患者尽快康复。
Objective To analyze the clinical nursing features of obstetrics and gynecology laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy. Methods 200 cases of obstetrics and gynecology patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each 100 cases. The observation group was treated by laparoscopy and the control group by traditional laparotomy. Combined with the characteristics of surgery to give targeted care, analysis of two groups of patients with nursing. Results The intraoperative blood loss (87.91 ± 12.09) ml, gastrointestinal function recovery time (1.98 ± 0.27) d, and total hospital stay (5.31 ± 0.76) days in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (148.31 ± 15.21) ml 3.21 ± 1.05) d, (7.85 ± 2.09) d, the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The score of SDS in the observation group was (32.13 ± 1.76) and the SAS score was (38.13 ± 1.45) in the observation group, which was lower than that in the control group (38.12 ± 1.64) and (42.52 ± 1.34), the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion According to laparoscopic surgery to patients with trauma, help to restore and other characteristics, can make clinical care more effective, to help patients recover as soon as possible.