“聚焦”栏目,《“草根”评委担大任》文章是一个不错的趣味点,只作为一篇文章出现,像一篇报导通稿有些可惜。这里应该做一些组织策划,比如从评委机制说起,纵观平遥、丽水、大理、连州等各大展赛,推行的都是专家评委制,而文中提到的浙江永康评选的新现象——大众评委制,预示着一种变革,在某种程度上这是一件好事。大家推选出自己喜爱的作品,这是个话语权的问题,可以采访整理出几位专业评委和大众评委的评论与观点来,无论是正面的还是反面的,这就是在当今疯狂大展的时代,对评委机制的一种议论和督导,这样一个小栏目就策划得比较学术了, “Focus ” column, “” Grassroots “Judges bear big responsibility” article is a good point of interest, only appeared as an article, like an article reported pass a pardon. Here should do some organizational planning, for example, starting from the jury mechanism, look at Pingyao, Lishui, Dali, Lianzhou and other major exhibitions, the implementation of the expert judges system, and the text mentioned Zhejiang Yongkang selected new phenomenon - - The public judges system, indicating a change, in a way this is a good thing. Everybody selects their own favorite works. This is a question of the right of speech. You can interview and sort out the comments and opinions of several professional judges and mass judges. Whether it is positive or negative, this is the era of today’s crazy exhibition. A discussion of the jury mechanism and supervision, such a small section of the planning more academic,