见危不救是否构成侵权行为历来是个备受争议的话题,当仅靠道德谴责达不到应有的社会效果时,将这一道德问题纳入法律的范畴实属必要。而在这一转化过程中,作为义务是一个关键性的考察因素,构成旁观者不作为侵权责任的前提。文章通过分析见危不救的法律性质和国外法中对于见危不救的法律规定,指出见危不救情形下的旁观者义务及其限制,以此论证其侵权责任的实质。 It is always a controversial topic whether or not infringement constitutes a crime of infringement. It is necessary to include this moral issue in the law when moral condemnation alone can not meet the due social effects. In this process of transformation, as a obligation is a key factor to consider, constitute the premise of onlookers not as tort liability. By analyzing the legal nature of perilous crimes and the legal provisions of the foreign law for preventing danger from danger, the article points out the bystander obligations and their restrictions under the circumstances of perilous crisis so as to demonstrate the substance of their tort liability.