论文部分内容阅读
最近,最高法院民一庭发布了一起涉及夫妻一方未经配偶同意,单方转让登记在自己名下的夫妻共有房屋的指导性案例,再次引发了公证行业对办理记名财产转让合同是否必须审查夫妻双方的意见,以及如何适用最高法院《关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第3条的争论。下面,笔者首先把上述最高法院公布的案例做一个简要介绍,然后就此案例谈几点粗浅的分析。
Recently, the Supreme People’s Court issued a guiding case involving a husband and wife sharing unilaterally their registered common house without the consent of their spouses, which again raised the need for the notary party to review the contract between the notary and the spouse And how to apply Article 3 of the Supreme Court’s “Interpretation on the Applicable Law to the Trial of a Dispute over Sales and Purchase Contract”. Below, I first make a brief introduction of the Supreme Court case, and then talk about the case a few superficial analysis.