论文部分内容阅读
2014年元月的“许志永聚众扰乱公共场所秩序”案的判决,因被告人有特殊的政治和法律人身份:毕业于兰州大学法律系,中国著名青年法律学者、宪政学者、海淀区人大代表,中国著名维权律师、参与呼吁废除收容教养制度……引发了社会的广泛关注。评说个案争议,检视法律得失个案法律程序的完成,并不意味着案件争议的止息,相反,相关的社会评论恰恰可以在个案之后,特别是从事法律教育和研究的法律
In January 2014, the judgment of Xu Zhizhong gathering disorderly disruption of public order resulted in the special political and legal person status of the defendant: graduated from Law Department of Lanzhou University, a famous Chinese young legal scholar, constitutional scholar, and Haidian District People’s Congress Representatives, well-known Chinese lawyers for protection of rights, and their appeal to abolish the system of housing and re-education ... have aroused widespread public concern. Commenting on case disputes and examining the success or failure of legal proceedings in a case does not imply a cessation of case disputes. On the contrary, relevant social commentary can happen right after the case, especially in law education and research