论文部分内容阅读
王健、顾劲松《涟水话的系词“斗”》(下简称《系词“斗”》),分析了涟水话的特殊系词[■~(55)]的用法,所论允当、描写详细,读后很有启发和收获。难能可贵的是,作者进一步探求这种特殊用法的历史来源。在方言文献缺乏的情况下,作者沙里淘金,比较参照汉藏语、外文研究文献,推测系词“斗”一种来源可能是从表示“正确”的“斗”演变而来,就像某些汉藏语系的语言一样,比如壮语南部方言邕宁话、壮语北部方言柳江话、布衣语、拉珈语等。遗憾的是,《系词“斗”》证明古代汉语中“斗”有“正确”义,并没有直接明显的例证,唯一的证明是唐代小说《启颜录》中的“豆”。我们认为这个文献例证需要进一步讨论,因此,系词“斗”的来源仍旧显得扑朔迷离,需要大家继续探寻。
Wang Jian and Gu Jinsong analyzed the usage of the special pronoun [■ ~ (55)] in Lianshui dialect, using the word “Dou” in Lianshui dialect (hereinafter referred to as the “cohort” , The appropriate terms, describe in detail, read after enlightenment and harvest. It is commendable that the author further explores the historical sources of this particular usage. In the absence of dialect literature, the author Shali Taojin compared with the Sino-Tibetan language and foreign literature and speculated that the source of the word “Dou” may have evolved from “Dou”, which represents “correctness” , As some languages of Sino-Tibetan languages, such as the southern dialect of Zhuang and Suining, the northern dialect of Zhuang and Zhuang dialect Liujiang dialect, commoner language, Lajia language and so on. Unfortunately, there is no direct and obvious evidence that “the word” “Dou” in ancient Chinese proves that there is a “correct ” meaning in ancient Chinese. The only proof is that in the “Kai Yan Lu” novel in the Tang Dynasty “Beans ”. We think this document exemplifies the need for further discussion. Therefore, the source of the clan “Dou ” still appears to be confusing and requires continued exploration.