论文部分内容阅读
《学术月刊》1989年第3期发表《<剩余价值理论>不是从重农学派开始研究的》一文。作者认为,资产阶级政治经济学史即狭义政治经济学史的起点是詹姆斯·斯图亚特。结合该文和它在脚注中所指出的作者的另外两篇文章,其论据和理由大致可以概括为如下几条:①作者曾强调他所说的《剩余价值理论》,仅限于马克思的《1861—1863年经济学手稿》即《资本论》第Ⅱ稿的“主体部分”:第6—15册笔记本中的内容;②这一《剩余价值理论》是一部政治经济学理论史或资产阶级政治经济学史;③资产阶级政治经济学史的起点或产生阶段是重商主义;④斯图亚特是重商主义者或英国重商主义的最后代表。上述看法是很值得商榷的。
“Academic Monthly” 1989 the third issue of “ is not from the heavy school of agriculture began to study” one article. The author thinks that the starting point of the history of bourgeois political economy, narrow sense of political economy, is James Stuart. In the light of the article and the other two articles by the author of the article and in the footnotes, the arguments and rationales can be broadly summarized as follows: ① The author has emphasized what he called the “theory of surplus value,” which is limited to Marx's “1861- The 1863 Economic Manuscripts, the ”Body Part“ of the Second Manuscript on Capital, the contents of notebooks 6-15; ② This ”surplus value theory" is a history of political economy or bourgeois politics The history of economics; (3) the starting point or stage of the history of bourgeois political economy is mercantilism; (4) Stuart is the last representative of Mercantilist or British mercantilism. This view is very debatable.