论文部分内容阅读
近日,北京市将“霾”写入该市气象灾害防治条例草案引发的有关气象、环保方面的专家与该市立法者之间的争议——即“霾的本质是污染而与气象自然灾害有着根本区别”、“将霾列为气象灾害会导致法律适用混乱”等观点与“应立法将作为气象灾害的雾霾纳入灾害天气突发应急体系”这个观点的冲突。笔者作为一名曾在省级人代会连续多年
Recently, Beijing “haze” written into the city meteorological disaster prevention and control bill triggered by the meteorological and environmental experts and the city’s lawsuit between the controversy - that is, “the essence of haze is pollution and weather Natural disasters have a fundamental difference ”,“ the haze as a meteorological disasters will lead to legal confusion ”and other ideas and “ should legislation will be included as meteorological disasters, haze disaster emergency system ”this conflict . The author as a people’s congress at the provincial level for many years