论文部分内容阅读
从《广艺舟双楫》与《孔子改制考》的比较中,我们可以发现,康有为激变思想中最为重要的表征,就是手法之激越,甚至多有武断、绝对、失真之处,为人所非议;再就是变革思想的一贯性,无论是《广艺舟双楫》时期,还是之后的《孔子改制考》时期,其一致性昭然;至于其理论基础,则来自于公羊今文经学。需要指出、强调的是,学界对康有为变革手法之激越甚至绝对化多所贬斥,乃是着意于形而忽略了质,若从激变思想立意,则当有助于准确解读其思想体系。
From the comparison between “Guang Yi Zhou Shuang” and “Confucius Restructuring”, we can find that the most important characterization of Kang Youwei’s thinking on change is the agitation of his technique, even more arbitrary, absolute and distorted, ; And then is the consistency of the idea of change, whether it is “Guang Yi Zhou Shuang” period, or later “Confucius restructuring test” period, its consistency is clear; as for its theoretical basis, it comes from the Ram Today text classics. What needs to be pointed out is that what is emphasized is that the academic community denigrated the radical and even absolute transformation of Kang Youwei as a metaphysical and neglected substance. It would help to accurately interpret his ideological system if the intention was to change his ideology.