论文部分内容阅读
董事义务的司法审查标准是各国公司法中的一个重要命题,其关涉董事与公司参与各方当事人之间利益平衡。如何激励董事积极履行职责促进公司利益最大化,又避免其因疏忽和懈怠损及公司、股东及其他利益相关者利益,是确定董事义务审查标准必须加以解决的难题。考察两大法系代表性国家关于董事义务司法审查标准的立法和司法实践,董事义务审查标准经历了由宽松到严格再到宽松的螺旋式演进过程,最终多数国家采纳主客观相结合作为司法裁判的主要标准。我国现行公司立法和司法实践关于董事义务的审查标准不利于公司治理结构的完善和公司参与各方当事人利益的平衡,应参酌两大法系有代表性国家的立法和司法实践经验,确立宽严相济、主客观相结合的我国公司董事义务的司法审查标准。
The judicial review standard of the duty of directors is an important proposition in the corporate law of each country, which concerns the interests balance between the parties and the participation of the directors and the company. How to motivate directors to actively perform their duties to promote the maximization of the interests of the company, and to avoid their negligence and slackness to the detriment of the interests of the company, shareholders and other stakeholders is a difficult problem that must be solved in determining the criteria for examining directors’ obligations. Examining the legislative and judicial practices of the representative countries in the two major legal systems on the judicial review of directors’compliance, the review of the standards of director obligations has undergone a spiraling evolution from leniency to strictness to leniency. In the end most countries adopted subjectivity and objectivity as judicial adjudication The main standard. China’s current corporate legislation and judicial practice on the review of the obligations of directors standards is not conducive to the improvement of corporate governance structure and the interests of the parties involved in the company’s balance should take into account the two major legal representative countries of the legislative and judicial practice of experience, The Judicial Review Standard of Our Country ’s Company Directors’ Obligation Combining Subjective and Objective.