论文部分内容阅读
作为制度引进之国或地区提升自身制度的一种手段,制度引进的最终目的在于通过对所引进制度进行适应性制度嫁接而厚植制度引进之国或地区本身制度创新的潜能,以实现制度生根。不同性质的市场结构对制度引进厂商及产业的适应性制度嫁接成本、参与制度引进竞赛的厂商数量以及制度生根本身各自具有不同的影响效应。与制度引进相关的制度创新存在溢出效应,且溢出效应对产业的制度学习具有乘数效应,并可藉此加速在产业层面形成相关制度基础及产业共有制度能力。溢出效应对制度生根具有正向影响效应,且溢出效应更强与竞争强度更高的市场结构更利于实现并加速制度生根。在一般常见的市场竞争结构中,如若边缘厂商的制度效率并不高于主导厂商,且边缘厂商的初始制度引进成本与其适应性制度嫁接成本为替代关系,则边缘厂商与主导厂商之间的制度引进竞争加剧不但无法加速制度生根,反倒会造成边缘厂商初始制度引进成本投入的大量重复浪费,进而难以促进社会福利极大化目标的实现。
As a means to promote the system in the country or region where the system is introduced, the ultimate goal of system introduction is to build up the potential of system innovation in the country or region where the system is introduced through the adaptive system grafting of the introduced system so as to realize the root of the system . The market structure of different nature has different impact effects on the grafting costs of adapting systems for introducing firms and industries, the number of firms participating in the system introduction and the system rooting itself. The spillover effect exists in the system innovation related to the system introduction, and the spillover effect has a multiplier effect on the system learning of the industry. This can accelerate the formation of the related institutional basis and the industry common system capability at the industrial level. The spillover effect has a positive effect on the root of the system, and the market structure with stronger spillover effect and stronger competition is more conducive to realizing and accelerating the system’s rooting. In the common market competition structure, if the system efficiency of the edge firms is not higher than that of the dominant firms, and the cost of introducing the initial institution of the edge firms and the replacement cost of the adaptive institution are alternative ones, the system between the edge firms and the dominant firms The introduction of intensified competition will not only speed up the system’s taking root, but on the contrary will result in a lot of duplication of waste in the introduction of initial costs by the marginalized manufacturers, and thus will hardly promote the realization of the goal of maximizing social welfare.