论文部分内容阅读
中国产业结构失衡在某种程度上与地方政府主导经济发展模式有关,但是,这种影响在地域上又有何差异呢?中央政府的转移支付对产业结构的影响又会怎么样呢?本文把地方政府作用与中央政府转移支付效果放在同一个框架下来考察,进而揭示两种作用的效果差异和表现。研究发现,地方政府行为不利于产业结构协调,而中央政府转移支付却对地区产业结构协调有很好的调节作用,并且发现这两种作用是互补的。研究还发现,东部地区地方政府行为更不利于产业协调,而中央转移支付效果对纠正产业偏离效果更为显著。
To some extent, the imbalance of China’s industrial structure has something to do with the dominant mode of economic development led by local governments. However, what is the difference in geographies? What happens to the impact of the transfer payments of the Central Government on the industrial structure? The role of local government and the central government transfer payment effect on the same framework under investigation, and then reveal the effects of the two differences and performance. The study found that the behavior of local governments is not conducive to the coordination of industrial structure, while the transfer payments of the central government have a good regulatory effect on the coordination of the industrial structure in the region, and found that the two roles are complementary. The study also found that the behavior of local governments in the eastern region is more detrimental to industrial coordination, while the effect of the central transfer payment is more significant to correct the industry deviation.