论文部分内容阅读
(20世纪)50年代初,法学界曾经对法律有无继承性问题展开过热烈的讨论,或说有,或说无,各抒己见,其中难免有些错误观点。例如,把法律说成是超阶级的,认为剥削阶级某些法律不仅反映压迫阶级的意志,也反映被压迫阶级的意志。但总的来说,讨论的气氛是健康的,思想是活跃的。可是后来,却出现了一种奇怪现象。凡是主张法律有继承性的,都被说成“旧法观点”。文化大革命中,又对一些曾经主张法律有继承性的同志进行批判。法学研究成为一潭死水,法律继承性问题成了不可
(20th Century) In the early 1950s, the legal profession once heatedly discussed the issue of the law’s inheritance or did it or not, expressing its own opinions, of which some erroneous views were unavoidable. For example, the law is said to be super-class, and certain laws of the exploiting class not only reflect the will of the oppressed classes but also reflect the will of the oppressed classes. But in general, the atmosphere for discussion is healthy and the mind is active. But then, there has been a strange phenomenon. Anyone who claims that law has inheritance is said to be “the point of view of the old law.” During the Cultural Revolution, some critics who once advocated the inheritance of law were criticized. Legal research has become a stagnant water, legal succession problems have become impossible