错判无辜的案件,虽然数量不多,但教训是极其深刻的。本期刊登的陈三洪被错判一案,又一次为我们敲响了警钟。文中对产生错判的原因作了较充分的剖析,值得广大审判工作者重视与深思。不管在任何情况下,办理任何案件,都必须坚持“质量第一”的方针,在“准”字上狠下功夫,确保办案质量。一个不能判错,更不允许杀错,所办案件要经得起历史的检验。 Misconduct innocent cases, although small in number, but the lesson is extremely profound. This issue of Chen Sanhong was sentenced to a wrong case, once again sounded the alarm for us. The article gives a more adequate analysis of the reasons for the wrong judgment and deserves the attention and reflection of the majority of trial workers. In any case, handling any case, we must uphold the principle of “quality first” and work hard on the “prospective” character to ensure the quality of the case. One can not adjudge the mistakes but not allow the wrongs to be killed. The cases handled can stand the test of history.