论文部分内容阅读
江苏高邮光明化工厂603元罚款事件迫使我们郑重思考《水污染防治法》第74条第1款的成败得失,该款采用倍率数距式的罚款设定方式具有一定的创新性,但其无法避免法律适用上的处罚畸轻畸重现象。该款所谓的“应缴纳排污费数额”含义为何,环境保护部的前后两个行政解释以及一些地方立法作出了不同的认定,法制不统一现象由是产生。运用文义解释和历史解释的方法,“应缴纳排污费数额”应当根据排污者在实际违法排污期间排放污染物的种类、浓度和排污量予以计算,环保部的行政解释和部分地方立法有违《水污染防治法》的立法本意。在《水污染防治法》修改过程中,可以通过扩大倍率数距的距差、采用“倍率数距式+数值保底式或数值数距式”或者改用“数值数距式”的罚款设定方式对现行《水污染防治法》第74条第1款进行完善。
The fine of 603 yuan for Jiangsu Gaoyou Guangming Chemical Factory forced us to seriously consider the success or failure of Article 74, paragraph 1, of the “Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law”. This paragraph adopts a multiple-rate-based fines setting method that is somewhat innovative but can not Avoidance of the penalties for the application of the law. The so-called “the amount of sewage charges to be paid, ” What is the meaning of the MEP two administrative interpretations and some local legislation made different recognition, the legal system is not uniform from the phenomenon. Using the method of textual interpretation and historical interpretation, the “amount of sewage charges to be paid” should be calculated according to the type, concentration and discharge of pollutants discharged by the polluter during actual illegal sewage discharge. The MEP’s administrative interpretation and some local legislation Violates the “Water Pollution Prevention Law,” the legislative intent. In the “water pollution prevention and control law” to modify the process, you can expand the distance between the magnification of the distance, the use of “multiplying ratio of distance + numerical protection of the bottom type or numerical distance type ” or use “numerical distance type Of the fine setting method of the current ”Water Pollution Prevention Law" Paragraph 1 of Article 74 to improve.