论文部分内容阅读
为缓解我国刑事诉讼“案多人少”的矛盾,2014年全国人大常委会授权“两高”在部分地区开展刑事速裁程序试点工作。2年试点期间,速裁程序的适用取得了明显成效,但同时也暴露出其在法律规范、法律援助和庭审模式等方面的问题。完善刑事速裁程序,就要建立快速分流机制,加强对被追诉人的权利保障,坚持“以审判为中心”。通过反思并完善速裁程序,为随之开展的刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度的试点工作提供参考,探求行之有效的改革思路。
In order to alleviate the contradiction between China’s criminal lawsuits and “fewer cases and more people”, in 2014, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress authorized the “two highs” to carry out pilot criminal penal proceedings in some areas. During the 2-year pilot period, the application of the speed-arbitration process has achieved remarkable results, but at the same time, it has also exposed its problems in legal norms, legal aid and trial mode. To improve the procedures for the speedy execution of criminal penalties, it is necessary to establish a rapid diversion mechanism and strengthen the protection of the rights of the persons sought. We should adhere to “centering on trials ”. By reviewing and perfecting the arbitration proceedings, we can provide a reference for the criminal cases to be punished in the follow-up criminal cases, and seek effective reform ideas.