年鉴《大事记》的收录标准 要写好大事记,首先必须选准大事,而要选准大事,就得有个能为人们接受的具体标准。能不能定个标准,拿出个规章来呢?难。近年来,方志界对《大事记》论述颇多,可供年鉴界借鉴(不是照搬！),但其论述重点多在体例方面。谈标准者多谓古人提出的“事大则书,变古则书,非常则书,意有所示则书,后有所因则书”及“关国家兴衰,系民生休戚,善可为法,恶可为戒”和今人归纳的“大事突出,要事不漏,新事不丢,锁事不记”。然而,实践证明,无论是 Yearbook “memorabilia” included criteria to write memorabilia, we must first select the major event, and to select the right events, you have to have a specific standard for people to accept. Can you set a standard, come up with a regulation? In recent years, a large number of articles have been written about “Memorabilia” by the local chronicles, which can be used for reference by the annals industry (not copied!), But the emphasis is more on the system. Talking about how many standard people call the old saying “things are big book, change the ancient book, very book, meaning book shows the book, after the reason book” and “off the rise and fall of the country, the livelihood of the common people, good for Law, evil can be ”and today’s inductive“ outstanding event, do not leak things, new things do not throw, the lock does not remember. ” However, practice has proved that either