论文部分内容阅读
《法律论证:思维与方法》较为全面概述了法律论证主要领域和核心问题研究的进展,展示了这个发展势头强劲领域的理论和实践应用的魅力与远大前景。不仅论述了国外法律论证研究的代表性理论,也评价了我国学者的贡献。当然,读者也有机会分享作者自己的看法。作者立足于法律论证理论的既有成果,对法律方法的概念作了厘清,就内部证立和外部证立的区分作了细致探讨,以一种全面的视角分析了三段论在法律论证中的作用和运用,对修辞学论证方法特别是论证图式的讨论,提供了更为丰富的方法和工具。在我看来,《法律论证:思维与方法》可以和菲特丽丝的《法律论辩基础》互为补充,因为前者以法律论证的问题为中心,后者以法律论证学者的理论为焦点。
The “Law Argument: Thinking and Methods” provides a more comprehensive overview of the progress made in the research on the major areas and core issues of legal argument, and demonstrates the attractiveness and lofty prospect of applying this theory and practice in this area with strong momentum of development. Not only discusses the representative theory of legal argumentation abroad, but also evaluates the contribution of Chinese scholars. Of course, readers also have the opportunity to share the author’s own opinion. Based on the existing achievements of the theory of legal argumentation, the author clarifies the concept of the legal method, discusses the distinction between internal and external proof, and analyzes the role of syllogism in legal argumentation from a comprehensive perspective And use of rhetorical arguments, especially argues the discussion of arguments, provides a richer method and tool. In my opinion, “legal argumentation: thinking and method” can complement each other with Frederic’s “legal argumentation foundation” because the former focuses on the issue of legal argumentation and the latter focuses on the theory of legal argumentation scholars.