论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析小儿肺炎患儿分别应用炎琥宁注射液治疗与鱼腥草注射液治疗的临床疗效及其安全性。方法:将我院收治的120例小儿肺炎患儿按照随机数字表法分为观察组(采用鱼腥草注射液治疗)和对照组(采用炎琥宁注射液治疗),对比观察两组患儿临床疗效、临床症状及体征改善时间以及不良反应发生率。结果:观察组患儿治疗总有效率(93.3%)与对照组(91.7%)相比,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患儿发热消退时间、平喘时间、止咳时间、肺部啰音消失时间相比也无显著差异(P>0.05);但观察组患儿不良反应发生率(1.7%)明显低于对照组(11.7%),差异对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:炎琥宁注射液和鱼腥草注射液都是治疗小儿肺炎的有效手段,临床效果显著,但鱼腥草注射液治疗的不良反应更小,患儿更容易耐受,值得在临床上广泛推广与应用。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the treatment of infantile pneumonia with Houttuynia injection and Houttuynia injection respectively. Methods: A total of 120 children with pneumonia admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (treated with Houttuynia cordata injection) and control group (treated with Yanhuning injection) according to the random number table, and compared between two groups Clinical efficacy, clinical symptoms and signs of improvement and the incidence of adverse reactions. Results: The total effective rate (93.3%) in the observation group was not significantly different from that in the control group (91.7%) (P> 0.05). The fever subsided time, antiasthmatic time, (P> 0.05). However, the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (1.7%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (11.7%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Both Yanhuoning injection and Houttuynia injection are effective methods to treat children pneumonia, and the clinical effect is remarkable. However, the adverse reaction of Houttuynia injection is smaller and the children are easier to tolerate, which is worth to be clinically Extensive promotion and application.