德福一致的问题在中西哲学中的解决显示出各自不同的智慧。康德强调追求幸福是人的义务 ,但又把它置于实践理性的约束之下 ,最终引出了上帝的公设来保证“至善”的实现。牟宗三以孟子的心性本体为依据 ,发掘其内在而超越的特性 ,将德福问题消解在体用之心内 ,使物随心转、心意知物只为一事 ,完成圆善论。实际上 ,他们都还笼罩在理性主体的阴影中 ,从而忽视对展开状态下生活世界的关注。作者认为通向真理的道路在马克思所指出的历史与实践中 The solution of the consistent problem of morality and well being in the philosophy of both China and the West shows their different wisdom. Kant stressed that the pursuit of happiness is a human obligation, but put it under the constraints of practical rationality, eventually led to the public of God to ensure the realization of “supremacy.” Mou Zongsan uses Mencius’ heart-noumenal basis as a basis to explore its intrinsic and transcendental characteristics. It digests the problem of morality and happiness in the heart of the body, makes things transit their hearts, and their knowledge and understanding are only one thing. In fact, they are still shrouded in the shadow of the rational subject, ignoring the concern about the living world in the unfolded state. The author believes that the road to truth is in the history and practice that Marx pointed out