论文部分内容阅读
西方的社会科学研究有三个国际问题研究范式。人类学文化与人格学派受整体主义影响,从整体来把握人,利用心理分析的视角研究日本,较好解释并预测了日本的国家行为,但后来的发展受到弗洛伊德人格心理学的制约。地区研究是基于还原主义思想把社会区分成不同部分,强调通过跨学科合作,把不同专业的知识整合起来,但如何把部分整合成整体的学问仍然困扰着研究人员。国际关系理论是预设国家行为体的属性相同,探讨国际体系对行为体的影响,有化约主义的影子,但从日本的例子来看,除非国家失去独特的文化特性,否则其学说很难有解释力。整体主义形成的范式更符合人存在的本质,未来在从事国际问题研究上可能有较大发挥空间。
Western social science research has three paradigms for studying international issues. Anthropological culture and school of personality influenced by the monolithism, grasp the people as a whole, the use of psychological analysis of the perspective of Japan, better explain and predict Japan’s national behavior, but later the development of Freudian personality psychology constraints . Regional studies are based on the idea of reductivism that divides society into different parts, emphasizes interdisciplinary cooperation, and integrates knowledge of different disciplines. However, how to integrate parts into a whole still bothers investigators. The theory of international relations presupposes the same attributes of state actors, and explores the influence of the international system on actors and the shadow of treatyism. However, judging from Japan’s example, unless the state loses its unique cultural identity, its theory is hard to argue Explain. The paradigm of the formation of holism is more in line with the essence of human existence. In the future, there may be room for more study on international issues.