在我国宅基地使用权的研究中,“福利性”经常被研究者引用。宅基地使用权的福利性在这些研究中,有时被当作无偿性、身份性、无期限性或不可流转性等的现实基础,有时也与这些属性混用。而在宅基地使用权初始取得、流转和期限的改进性研究中,福利性又在很多情况下,成为了批判的对象。那么,我国宅基地使用权是否具有福利性?福利性与无偿性、身份性、无期限性和不可流转性等在法律 In the study of usufruct of homestead in our country, “welfare” is often quoted by researchers. The welfare of the right to use homesteads is sometimes used as a basis for realism, such as gratuitous, identity, indefinite or non-negotiable, in these studies, sometimes in combination with these attributes. In the research on the initial acquisition, circulation and expiration of the right to use homestead, in many cases, the welfare has become the object of criticism. So, whether the usufruct of the right to use homesteads in our country is of welfare? Welfare and non-payment, identity, indefiniteness,