培哚普利/吲哒帕胺复合制剂治疗高血压患者的多中心、随机、双盲对照研究

来源 :中国新药杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wlflfxzq45
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较低剂量培哚普利/吲哒帕胺复合制剂与吲哒帕胺缓释剂治疗高血压患者血压的变化和治疗反应率及其安全性。方法:共入选原发性高血压病患者231例。经2周安慰剂洗脱期后,分为试验组(n=116)和对照组(n=115)。完成试验患者210例,符合方案分析集(PPS)203例,其中试验组107例,对照组96例。2组随机双盲接受培哚普利2 mg/吲哒帕胺0.625 mg或吲哒帕胺缓释剂(纳催离SR)1.5 mg,qd;治疗6周后,如果舒张压(DBP)<90 mmHg。继续上述治疗;如果DBP≥90 mmHg,试验组改为qid口服培哚普利4 mg/吲哒帕胺1.25 mg;对照组在纳催离SR的基础上加用美托洛尔50 mg,qd,继续治疗6周。部分患者在治疗前及治疗12周时行动态血压检测(ABPM)。结果:用药后第6周时,试验组药物剂量加倍比率为48.6%(52/107),对照组有54.2%(52/96)的病例需加用美托洛尔,两组加药率比较无差异(P=0.43)。与给药前比较,治疗12周后两组DBP均明显下降(P<0.01),下降幅度试验组和对照组平均为12.4和13.6 mmHg(P=0.191),两组收缩压(SBP)在用药后备时点亦均明显下降(P<0.01),下降幅度为15.4和15.7 mmHg。两组ABPM各指标均明显下降,试验组和对照组的DBP谷峰比(T/P)为80%和47%。两组不良事件发生率无差异,主要的不良事件为咳嗽、鼻炎、低钾血症。结论:2种治疗方法12周后均可显著降低DBP和SBP。试验组可以维持24 h平稳降压。两组不良反应发生率相似。 OBJECTIVE: To compare the changes of blood pressure, response rate and safety of low-dose perindopril / indapamide and indapamide in the treatment of patients with hypertension. Methods: A total of 231 patients with essential hypertension were enrolled. After 2 weeks of placebo elution, they were divided into experimental group (n = 116) and control group (n = 115). 210 patients completed the trial, in line with 203 cases of program analysis set (PPS), of which 107 cases in the test group, 96 cases in the control group. Two groups were randomized and double-blind received perindopril 2 mg / indapamide 0.625 mg or indapamide sustained-release agent (natrium SR) 1.5 mg, qd; after 6 weeks of treatment, if diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg. Continue the above treatment; if DBP ≥ 90 mmHg, the experimental group was changed to oral qd oral perindopril 4 mg / indapamide 1.25 mg; control group on the basis of natrium SR plus metoprolol 50 mg , qd, continue treatment for 6 weeks. Some patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure testing (ABPM) before treatment and at 12 weeks of treatment. Results: At the 6th week after treatment, the dose doubling ratio of the experimental group was 48.6% (52/107), while that of the control group was Metoprolol 54.2% (52/96) Dosing rate was no difference (P = 0.43). Compared with those before treatment, the DBP in both groups decreased significantly after 12 weeks of treatment (P <0.01), and the decreasing range was 12.4 and 13.6 mmHg in the experimental and control groups (P = 0.191) Systolic blood pressure (SBP) also decreased significantly (P <0.01) at 15 and 15.7 mmHg. The indexes of ABPM in both groups were obviously decreased, and the DBP peak-to-peak ratio (T / P) of test group and control group was 80% and 47% respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. The main adverse events were cough, rhinitis and hypokalemia. Conclusion: DBP and SBP can be significantly reduced by both treatments after 12 weeks. Test group can maintain stable blood pressure 24 h. The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was similar.
其他文献
在纤维素降解过程中,通过化学的方法对纤维素原料进行预处理,可以大大的促进纤维素的降解.本试验对甜高粱秸秆采用了碱、酸二种处理方法,并初步研究了降解纤维素预处理的最佳
首先对数控车床的坐标系、编程要点作了介绍,并通过简单的轴类零件给出了不同指令的编程方法.对刀尖圆弧半径补偿作了较详细的说明,最后针对FANUC Oi系统数控车床,给出了带有
国产数控系统中以华中数控和广州数控应用的最为广泛。近些年,北京凯恩帝公司研制生产的数控系统在市场上占有一定份额,尤其在高校及大、中专院校实训中采用较多。文中以北京
21世纪是信息、电子技术快速发展的世纪,各类电子产品被广泛应用到电力设备上,所以,维修电工的维修任务、维修方法也随着新产品的投入使用而变化着,这就要求维修电工不断学习
在改革陈旧、死板、教条的旧课堂教学模式的呼声一浪高过一浪的背景下,社会各界对此一直颇多赞誉,教师亦一直奉此为圭臬。那么,语文课发展至现阶段到底少了些什么呢?或许是少
依据工程量清单计价模式的基本概念及基本原理,针对工程项目各个阶段的差异分别进行探讨,并提出一些实用的造价控制方法.
推动企业自主创新是我们所面临的迫切任务,从微观层次上,深入分析和研究是何种因素引发了组织内的创新行为,何种机制有助于提升企业的创新能力具有十分重要的意义。本文从组
课堂教学情境创设是当今新课程改革的重要内容,它是以学生为主体、以教师为主导的新型教学模式,是历史教学的一大特色。 Creation of classroom teaching situation is an i
文章介绍了深孔松动爆破的概念、优点、参数设计、施工技术,介绍了深孔松动爆破在铁路桥梁超大超深基坑施工中的应用,为同类工程施工提供一定的借鉴.
立体几何是高中阶段的重难点,而且对学生的空间想象能力要求也越来越高.对与两条异面直线成等角的直线条数问题进行探究,并进一步推广到与两相交平面成等角的直线条数问题.