“回到马克思”是 90年代中期以来流传在我国马克思主义哲学界的一个响亮口号。这是一种极重要的理论折射。它反映了随着改革开放和思想解放运动深入 ,马克思主义哲学研究所发生的深层次发展 ,以及这种理论创新与解释当代社会历史实践最新发展的理论冲动。但是 ,“回到马克思”这个口号本身从一开始也遭遇了一些误解 ,特别是随着“现代性”和“后现代性”问题的兴起 ,一些学者要求马克思的思想应该具有一种直接的当代性立场 ,以服务于解释当今世界激剧变化的需要。近期以来 ,对“回到马克思”的评论和提出替代口号成为我国马克思主义哲学研究的一个较为显著的景观。在此 ,我们编发了一组相关讨论的笔谈 ,从马克思主义哲学的基本特征、当代性问题的实质、马克思与当代性对话的方式、在今天我们面对马克思的基本立场以及“回到马克思”的基本意蕴诸方面 ,较为系统地阐发了马克思哲学与当代哲学之间批判性对话的前提和入口 ,重申了“回到马克思”是这种对话的基础。我们想强调 ,在当前马克思主义哲学研究中 ,问题并不在于通过争论确定一种大家都接受的口号 ,而是真正理解我们今天讨论所立足的理论基础 ,这也是学术继承 (坚持马克思主义哲学的基本立场 )和开新 (在当代性上深化和发展马克思主义哲学 )最核心 “Back to Marxism” is a loud slogan circulating in the Marxist philosophical circles of our country since the mid-1990s. This is a very important theoretical refraction. It reflects the deep-seated development that took place in the Institute of Marxist Philosophy with the deepening of the reform and opening up and the ideological liberation movement, as well as the theoretical impulse of this theory to innovate and explain the latest development of contemporary social and historical practices. However, the slogan “Back to Marxism” itself has encountered some misunderstandings from the very beginning. Especially with the rise of “modernity” and “post-modernity,” some scholars have demanded that Marx’s thinking should have a direct contemporary Sexual positions to serve the need to explain the dramatic changes in the world today. Recently, the comment on “Back to Marx” and the alternative slogan have become a more significant landscape for the study of Marxist philosophy in our country. Here we have compiled a series of written speeches on related discussions. From the basic features of Marxist philosophy, the essence of contemporary issues, and the way in which Marx talks with the present age, today we face Marx’s basic position and “return to Marx” . It systematically expounded the preconditions and entrances of the critical dialogue between Marxist philosophy and contemporary philosophy and reiterated that “returning to Marx” is the basis of such dialogue. We would like to emphasize that in the current study of Marxist philosophy, the issue is not to establish an all-accepted slogan by arguing but to truly understand the theoretical basis upon which our discussion today is based. This is also the reason why academic succession (insisting on Marxist philosophy Basic position) and opening a new era (deepening and developing Marxist philosophy in the contemporary era)