《孟子·离娄章句下》有这么一句话:“孟子曰‘仲尼不为已甚者.’”杨伯峻《孟子译注》译为:“孟子说:‘孔子是做什么事都不过火的人。”杨把“不为已甚者”理解为“不为已甚之事者”,即“不干过火事情的人”,是“者”字结构作判断句的谓语。此说可商。一、犯了增字解经的忌讳。二、对原文句法结构的理解,与实际不符。原文是一个表否定的叙述句。 “Mencius from the Lou chapter of the sentence,” there is such a sentence: “Mencius said Zhongni is not even worse.” “Yang Boshan,” translated “Mencius:” Confucius is doing anything fire people “Yang interprets” what has not been done before “as” what is not done “, that is,” people who do not work too hard “, and is the predicate of the judgments of the” person "structure. This is acceptable. First, guilty of a taboo word by word. Second, the understanding of the original syntactic structure, and the actual does not match. The original is a negative statement of the table.