论文部分内容阅读
对杜预《春秋左氏经传集解》的批评与纠正,实与清代《春秋》左氏学史相始终,但学术界历来重视清代前期和中期的杜解补正著作,对晚清学人纠补杜解的成绩较少措意。晚清经学名家皮锡瑞的《左传浅说》,就是一部至今不为人知的杜解补正力作。本文从增加对杜解错误的纠正、改正清儒纠杜的失误、重视对孔疏错误的纠正、新解新说独具创见等四个方面列举例证,具体分析《左传浅说》纠补杜解的学术成就。皮锡瑞在继承和批评前人杜解补正成果的基础上,对《春秋左传正义》的错误与阙失作了一次认真清理,使杜解补正更趋完善,今天研究清代《春秋》学史和从事《左传》校注,理应重视《左传浅说》。
The criticism and rectification of Du’s prelude to the collection of the Spring and Autumn Zuo Shijie have always been consistent with the history of Zuo Shou in the Spring and Autumn Period in the Qing Dynasty. However, the academic circles have always attached great importance to the work of making up and correcting the book in the early and mid-Qing dynasties, Mediocre people to remedy the results less likely to. In the late Qing Dynasty, famous writer Pi Xirui’s “Zuo Zhuan Shuo” was a hitherto unknown unknown remedy. This paper gives examples from the following four aspects: increasing corrections of Du ’s mistakes, correcting mistakes of Duke Qing and Du Fu, attaching importance to the correction of Kong Shu’ s mistakes, Solutions to academic achievements. On the basis of inheriting and criticizing the predecessors’ displeasing and correcting achievements, Pi Xirui conscientiously cleared up the mistakes and shortcomings of the “Spring and Autumn Zuo Chuan Justice,” so as to perfect Du’s remedy. Today, Learning history and engaged in “Zuo Zhuan” school notes, should pay attention to “Zuo Chuan shallow”.