论文部分内容阅读
看到《我的老师》这道作文试题的写作要求,就自然地想到旧时科举考试的八股文。这些要求是死板的,束缚学生思想的。任其传扬,对于写作教学不利。众所周知,文章的形式是由内容决定的,形式为内容服务,形式和内容不能分割。这是写作的基本原则。可是《我的老师》作文题的写作要求恰恰违反了这一原则。不管你写什么对象,什么内容,先预制了一个死板的模式;一律的开头,一律的结尾,连全文写五个自然段,每个自然段几句话,都规定得死死的,这实际上是把内容与形式分割开了,把
Seeing the writing requirements of the “My Teacher” essay test question, it naturally thinks of the eight-letter text of the old imperial examination. These demands are rigid and hamper students’ thinking. Ren Qichuan is not good for writing teaching. As we all know, the form of the article is determined by the content, in the form of content service, and the form and content cannot be divided. This is the basic principle of writing. However, the writing requirement of the “My Teacher” essay question exactly violates this principle. No matter what object you write, what content is first prefabricated with a rigid model; the beginning of the law, all the end, even the full text of five natural paragraphs, each paragraph of a few paragraphs, are stipulated to be dead, this is actually The first step is to separate the content from the form.