论文部分内容阅读
文章通过对所有56位评分员的评分实验以及对其中四位评分员的深入实验和评分回溯,间接地考察了2015年全国高校英语专业八级考试汉译英项目的评分。研究得出:本次评分的评分员间信度较好,对高质量文本和低质量文本评分都具有较好的相对一致性,但在对低质量译文评分时自由度较大;同时,译词的选用、译句的形式变化以及译文的语法正确性是评分员实际整体评分时的主要考虑因素,虽然这些方面可能存在交互作用,但其中对译句结构的考量要略重于对译词选用的考量;此外,评分员对译文中出现的连逗句这一语法失误还关注不够。文章最后对提高八级考试汉译英的评分效度提出了建议。
The article indirectly scrutinizes the scores of the Chinese-English translation project of the Eighth-level English CET-8 Test for 2015 by reviewing the scoring of all 56 scorers as well as the in-depth experiments and grading of the four scorers. The study shows that the score between the graders has good interoperability, good consistency with high quality texts and low quality texts, but there is more freedom in grading low quality translations. At the same time, The choice of the word, the change of the form of the translation and the correctness of the grammar of the translation are the main considerations in the actual overall grading of the grader. Although there may be some interaction between these aspects, the structure of the sentence should be given more consideration than the choice of the translated word In addition, the grader failed to pay enough attention to the grammatical errors that even conjunctions appeared in the translation. Finally, the article puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the validity of CEQA.