论文部分内容阅读
除了国家文化领导部门,任何单位与个人都无权禁戏。另一方面,戏剧创作过程是与观众共同完成的,是观众就有权褒贬、臧否任何演出。这是不应混淆的两码事。在这样的前提下,观众(也包括专业的戏剧评论家)的直抒胸臆或品评月旦。方不致被误解成对某一具体剧目可否公演的干涉。应该是,评论愈活跃,剧目越丰富,而不是相反。眼下有不少剧种,仍然在靠着传统剧目过日子,不过演出的剧目却愈来愈少,戏路子愈来愈窄。实在没辙了,便在过去曾被禁演或因评价分歧而自行弃演的剧目上打主意。象《四郎探母》《红鬃烈马》《连环套》《乌盆记》《活捉三郎》等。可是,对这类剧目思想内容的讨论,反倒寂然了。在京华的剧坛上,有一次演出了建国后即停止演出的昆剧《铁冠图》中的几出折子戏:“对刀”、“撞钟”、“刺虎”,演出后亦不见有所讨论。与此同时,在报刊上却出现了对
In addition to the national culture leading department, no unit or individual has the right to forbid the play. On the other hand, the drama creation process is done together with the audience, the audience have the right to praise and criticism, Zang any performance. This is two different things that should not be confused. In such a premise, the audience (including professional theater critics) straightforward expression or comment on the New Year’s Day. The party will not be misunderstood as to interfere with the performance of a particular repertoire. Should be, the more active comments, the more rich the show, not the opposite. Now there are many operas, still relying on the traditional repertory live, but the show’s repertoire is less and less, the narrative is getting narrower and narrower. It is nothing, then in the past had been banned for performance or because of differences in appraisal and to abandon their own play on the play on the idea. Like “Siro exploration of the mother,” “red bristle horse”, “Rim”, “Wu basin” “catch Saburo” and so on. However, the discussion of the ideological content of such repertory, but the silence. In the Jinghua drama scene, there were a few performances in Kunqu Opera “Iron Crown” that stopped after the founding of the People’s Republic of China: “The Knife,” “The Bell,” and the “Thorn Tiger.” Discussed. In the meantime, the press appeared