论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨留守与非留守青少上在自我和谐及应对方式上的差异及各自的特征。方法采用自我和谐量表(SCCS)及应对方式问卷对321名青少年进行问卷调查。结果1留守青少年在自我经验的不和谐性上比非留守青少年高,但差异不显著;2留守青少年表现更多的自我刻板性,及自责和退避的应对方式;3父母情感和睦及父亲、母亲温暖慈爱的教育模式下,青少年表现出更多的解决问题等积极的应对方式。结论留守青少年与非留守青少年在自我和谐性及应对方式上均存在一定程度的差异;不管是留守还是非留守青少年的父母都应注意夫妻间情感模式及教育方式对子女的影响,引导孩子建立积极的应对方式。
Objective To explore the differences and their respective characteristics of self-harmony and coping style between left-behind and non-left-behind youth. Methods A total of 321 adolescents were surveyed using the Self-Consistency Scale (SCCS) and Coping Style Questionnaire. Results 1 Left-behind adolescents were higher than non-left-behind adolescents in the incommensurability of self-experience, but the difference was insignificant.2 Left-adolescent adolescents showed more self-stereotyping and self-reproach and retreat; 3 Relationship between parents’ affection and father, Under the warm and loving education mode of mothers, adolescents showed more positive coping styles such as solving problems. Conclusion Both left-behind and left-behind youth have some differences in their self-consistency and coping styles. Parents who stay behind or stay behind should pay attention to the influence of their emotional patterns and education methods on their children, and guide their children to establish positive Coping style.