论文部分内容阅读
有句话是这么说的:那些安德鲁、矶崎新、库哈斯和赫佐格什么的,其实就是建筑界的可口可乐。这样的说法似乎有些刺激,没关系,我们可以换句话说:他们是奥迪、别克、桑塔那、捷达……这样的类比显然还是有点不是味道。没事儿的,咱们还能这么说:他们是 Prada、Armani、Polo、Gucci……是 Ikea、B&B、Cassina、Alessi……但是,为什么一定要比喻?拿可口可乐和那些早过了时的桑塔那、捷达来说明大师们的价值,是不是有点不伦不类?好吧,也许这么说会恰当些:他们是建筑的斯皮尔伯格、哈里逊·福特、吴宇森、周润发……
There is a saying to say: What those of Andrew, Arata Isozaki, Koolhaas, and Herzog are actually Coca-Cola in architecture. This argument seems to be a little stimulating. It doesn’t matter. We can put it another way: They are Audi, Buick, Santana, Jetta... The analogy is obviously not a bit of a taste. All right, we can say this: They are Prada, Armani, Polo, Gucci... Ikea, B&B, Cassina, Alessi... But why do you have to be an analogy? Take Coca-Cola and Santana when it’s overdue Jetta to explain the value of the masters, is not it a bit nondescript? Well, maybe it would be appropriate to say this: They are Spielberger, Harrison Ford, John Woo, Chow Yun-fa...