论文部分内容阅读
我国现行民事立法对被告答辩的规定相当粗略,对于被告而言,答辩仍旧是一项没有任何限制的权利,由此造成了被告答辩行为的随意性、任意性。这种答辩任意主义与提高审判效率的要求背道而驰,实有必要借鉴其他国家民事诉讼法中关于被告答辩制度的有益经验,重新设计更加完备的民事被告答辩制度以实现审理前准备阶段应有功能的正常发挥,继而提高审判效率,缓解“案多人少”矛盾。
The current civil legislation in our country provides a fairly rough reply to defendants. For the defendant, the defense is still a right without any restrictions, thus resulting in the arbitrariness and arbitrariness of defendant’s reply. This kind of defense arbitrariness runs counter to the requirement of improving the efficiency of trial, so it is necessary to draw on the useful experience of the defendant’s defense system in other countries’ civil procedure law and to redesign the more comprehensive civil defendant’s defense system so as to realize the function Normal play, and then improve the trial efficiency, ease “many cases less ” contradiction.