论文部分内容阅读
比较常规法和热压法所制作的实验标本挠屈强度的差异及两种方法所制作嵌体密合度的差异。采用双轴向三点支撑法测量实验标本的挠屈强度，用工具显微镜测量嵌体的密合度。结果表明，两种方法所制作的实验标本的挠屈强度无显著性差异（Ｐ＞０．０５）。用热压法制作的嵌体的密合度优于常规法（Ｐ＜０．０１）。热压技术设备简单、操作方便，可以提高瓷嵌体边缘密合度及外形准确性
The difference between the flexural strength of the experimental specimens made by the conventional method and the hot-pressed method and the inlay adhesion produced by the two methods were compared. The biaxial three-point support method was used to measure the flexural strength of the experimental specimens, and the intimacy of the inlays was measured with a tool microscope. The results showed that there was no significant difference in flexural strength between the two methods (P> 0.05). Inlays made by hot pressing have better adhesion than conventional methods (P <0.01). Hot pressing technology and equipment is simple, easy to operate, can improve the edge of inlay ceramic inlay and shape accuracy