论文部分内容阅读
《商标法》关于商品类似、商标近似均以是否容易导致混淆误认为判断标准,判断的时间点通常是诉争商标申请日,因此判断是否足以导致混淆通常不应当考虑诉争商标在申请日后经过使用产生知名度的情况。在诉争商标与引证商标构成使用在相同或者类似商品上的近似商标的情况下,诉争商标的使用行为属于违反《商标法》相关规定的行为,此种行为在引证商标权利人已提出明确主张的情况下,原则上不因持续使用时间长而获得正当性。只有在极其特殊的情况下,才应当考虑诉争商标在其申请日后的使用和知名度,依据客观上已经区别开来的市场实际情况准许其注册。
The Trademark Law on Commodity Similar and Trademark Approximations often misleads confusion into judgment criteria, usually at the filing date of the dispute, and therefore determines whether it is sufficient to cause confusion. It should not usually be considered whether the dispute mark passes after the date of filing Use to generate awareness of the situation. Where the competing trademark and the quoted trademark constitute similar marks that are used on the same or similar goods, the use of the competing trademark is a violation of the relevant provisions of the Trademark Law, and such acts have been clearly stated in the quoted trademark right holders In the case of assertion, in principle, there is no justification for long duration of use. Only in extremely exceptional circumstances should we consider the use and popularity of countervailing marks after their filing date and allow them to be registered on the basis of objectively differentiated market conditions.