论文部分内容阅读
巴赫金有关“苏格拉底对话”的论述是直接服务于他对陀思妥耶夫斯基小说体裁和情节布局特点的描摹。“苏格拉底对话”作为言语体裁的一种,它在思想、对话、形象等要素上奠定了“庄谐体”的基础且与小说发展史上“狂欢体”线索密切相连。论文从“苏格拉底对话”与言语体裁、“苏格拉底对话”与思想形象、“苏格拉底对话”的狂欢式感受三个方面分析了这一言语体裁与“狂欢体”线索相连的原因,着重探讨了其内在的“对话”属性,从而指出构成思想形象的前提在于对话关系对个别声音、个别意识的明确,个别声音、个别意识对于对话关系的塑造。
Bakhtin ’s account of “Socratic dialogue ” is a direct service of his tracing of the genres and plot features of Dostoyevsky’s novels. “Socratic dialogue ” as a kind of speech genre, which lays the foundation of “Zhuang harmonic body ” in the elements of thought, dialogue and image and is closely linked to the “Carnival ” clues in the history of the development of the novel . The essay analyzes the genre and language from three aspects of “Socratic dialogue” and speech genre, “Socratic dialogue” and ideological image, and “carnivalesque feelings” of “Socratic dialogue” Carnival body “clues, focusing on its intrinsic ” dialogue "attribute, which pointed out that the premise of the formation of the image of thought lies in the relationship between dialogue on the individual voice, individual awareness of a clear, individual voice, individual awareness of the relationship between the dialogue shape.