论文部分内容阅读
文章认为在刑事诉讼活动中,应当合理界定证明责任与举证责任的概念,证明责任强调的是一个状态过程,举证责任针对的是举出证据的行为义务。整个刑事诉讼过程中,应当围绕控方对被告人有罪、罪重的证明责任,而负有证明责任的诉讼一方对待证事实的论证所达到的真实程度就是证明标准,如未达到一定的证明标准就可能要承担判决被告人无罪或者罪轻的后果。在我国的刑事诉讼活动中的唯一证明标准就是“事实清楚,证据确实、充分。”
The article holds that in the criminal procedure activities, the concept of burden of proof and burden of proof should be rationally defined. The burden of proof emphasizes the state process, and the burden of proof is against the obligation of proof. In the entire process of criminal proceedings, the prosecution should focus on the burden of proof on the guilty party of the defendant, and the true extent to which the party holding the proof of litigation treats the fact of the card is the proof standard. If not, certain proof standards have not been met It may be necessary to bear the consequences of not guilty or guilty of defending the accused. The only standard of proof in criminal proceedings in our country is that “the facts are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient.”