《中学语文》第一期刊登了《读<包身工>琐记》一文,读后很受启发,得益非浅。但也有一点不成熟的异议,愿提出来商榷。《读<包身工>琐记》中说:“《包身工》与一般报告文学不尽相同,作品中没有一个完整的人物,没有一件完整的事件,通篇是一些片片断断的零星材料。”《包身工》有没有完整的人物,与分析该文关系甚重,需作深究。《包身工》依时间为序写包身工一整天的生活.着重写“起床”、“吃粥”、“劳动”以及对这三个场面的分析和揭露。被组织进去的片片断断的零星材料,大部分用来 In the first issue of the “Chinese Language for Middle Schools”, a book entitled “Reading In Minutes” was published. After reading it, he was inspired and benefited greatly. However, there is also an immature objection and I would like to discuss it. “Reading Minutes,” said: “” Baoshen Gong “is not the same as the general reportage, the work does not have a complete figure, there is no complete event, the whole article is fragmentary pieces of fragmented material.” Whether Baoshengong has complete characters or not has a lot to do with analyzing this article. Baoshengong writes the whole life of Baoshen according to the time. He has rewritten “get up,” “eat porridge,” and “labor,” and has analyzed and exposed these three scenes. The fragmented, fragmented material that is organized into