在复合判断直接推理中,真值表方法的应用频率之高较为明显。它将一组判断各自可能的若干真假情况一一对应排列,然后鉴定其真值是否相等、几者之间是否可以互推,显得十分简明、直观,而且一般认为十分精确。如果可以把逻辑推理比作数学演算的话,真值表方法就好象用火柴杆做加减法,只要数量数得不错,答案似乎就应是无庸 In the direct judgment of compound judgment, the high frequency of truth table method is obvious. It will be a group of judgments about the possibility of a number of true and false one by one corresponding to the order, and then determine whether their true value is equal, whether the number of each other can push each other, is very concise, intuitive, and generally considered very accurate. If you can compare logical reasoning to mathematical calculus, the truth-table approach is like adding and subtracting with a matchstick, and as long as the number is good enough, the answer seems to be non-existent