军事学术研究为军事决策提供咨询的功用越来越被重视。学术研究需要论证。由于在历史的冷板凳上坐得太久,论证常常被几种片面、错误的论证方法所困扰。照搬论证。即脱离我军实际,把外军的论证观点照搬、照套到我军的决策上。这样的论证往往缺少我军的特色,使决策游弋于上层,成为无本之木。长官论证。仅凭决策首脑的主观推测为决策依据,使论证屈从于长官意志,不能反映集体和群众的正确意见,导致整个决策的偏差。迎合论证。迎合长官意志,以长官的好恶为决策 The role of military academic research in advising military decision-making is gaining more and more attention. Academic research needs argument. Arguments are often haunted by several one-sided and erroneous arguments because of sitting too long on the bench of history. Copy argument. That is, from the reality of our army, copying the arguments of the foreign military’s arguments and making decisions according to our army. Such arguments often lack the characteristics of our military and make the decision-making cruise to the top and become a tree without capital. Executive argument. Subjective guesses by decision-makers alone are the basis for decision-making, allowing arguments to be subordinated to the will of the executive and failing to reflect the correct opinions of the collective and the masses, leading to deviations in the overall decision-making. Meet the argument. Catering to the will of the Chief Executive, making decisions based on the likes and dislikes of the Chief Executive